Since starting the blog about shipping in South Africa i have been scouting the internet to check for other blogs relating to shipping and freight industry.. There are not that many and certainly none that provide the information that i am providing here..
Hence i have created an international shipping blog http://theworldofshipping.wordpress.com which is designed to discuss about the shipping process in general followed the world over..
In due course i hope to secure some contributions from other like minded people in the other parts of the world and create a “truly international blog about shipping”..






I ship internationally on a daily basis. I would be happy to comment on your blog posts if I have any insight.
By: Mohammed Siddiqui on January 28, 2009
at 8:52 am
Our involvement in shipping is securing the vessel and crew during transit, but I am interested to learn other parts of the shipping business.
By: Michael Murrell on February 13, 2009
at 4:34 pm
Hi Michael, thanks for the bookmarking.. I will be covering the topic of ships operations in my forthcoming articles.. Maybe you can contribute to the security aspect of the same and write something about ISPS on the ships so that the customers understand what they are really paying for.. Will keep you updated..
By: manaadiar on February 13, 2009
at 4:41 pm
I am a International co-ordinator for a household removal company and would like to know more about shipping eg. our freight forwarder is Safcorpanalpina who books our containers. I would like to know more of what there processes are and in general learn more about shipping. I have been in this industry for 16 months and thourougly enjoy what I do. This is totally different to what I was doing before and don;t think that there is any other Job as exciting, pressurised and each move is different every day,
By: Bernice on March 3, 2009
at 6:34 pm
Welcome to the world of shipping Bernice.. If you have already subscribed to this blog, you will be updated on all upcoming articles.. This blog will cover most of your questions..
By: manaadiar on March 4, 2009
at 11:54 am
Please give me some ideas on the topics you would like to discuss in relation to piracy and I will be happy to address them. With exception of the political aspects as am not a government person, just a person involved with anti piracy operations globally.
By: Michael Murrell on March 4, 2009
at 6:31 pm
Dear All, This is me Nahla working in the field of container shipping liner hope to receive any updated knowledge and keep me posted what so ever in maritime and shipping notes and reads .
nahla
cotte410@hotmail.com
By: nahla on March 7, 2009
at 3:08 pm
Firearms or no firearms? It’s the wrong question.
Proponents and opponents of arming ships against pirate attack may be asking the wrong questions suggests Mike Murrell, director of operations for anti-piracy specialist International Ships Support Group, ISSG. The company recently extended its logistics support system to key points to enable its eight-man teams to embark and disembark vessels approaching areas presenting high threat levels of pirate attacks.
Complex legal issues surround the presence of firearms on ships while the effectiveness of non-lethal defense systems has recently been brought into question. Murrell, whose company uses its own specially designed deterrence systems, believes that a different approach is needed to meet the concerns of shipping companies, flag states, P&I Clubs and seafarers’ organizations.
Says Murrell: “Pirates don’t seem to be too afraid of gunfire. Apart from still unresolved legal issues about firearms having a highly visible armed team on deck gives the pirates a more concentrated target, which, if neutralized, gives the vessel no other options. If you engage the aggressor too early you end up with a firefight rather that ship defense. In fact it can actually invite pirates to attack even more fiercely if they believe that armed protection indicates a high-value cargo worth dying for. And let’s face it, the last thing you want on oil, gas or chemical tanker is a firearm going off.
“High powered audio defense systems have a place but, as recent events have shown, they aren’t enough on their own and the equipment operators also become targets for the pirate firearms. But just because there are no guns onboard it doesn’t mean the ship is unarmed.“
The answer, says Murrell, is what he terms ‘less than lethal’ equipment, a sufficiently large and well-trained team and a calibrated response that provides the element of surprise should an attack take place. Much of the equipment has been designed or adapted by ISSG and is legal in almost all jurisdictions.
“We have a suite of protective devices that won’t set off too many alarms when our teams fly out to join a ship. In a sense, they don’t actually exist until the equipment is actually on the ship. This equipment will disable pirate skiffs and negate the pirate’s ability to continue an attack, when used by an appropriately trained team. Firearms come with an enormous cost burden so our decision to use less than lethal force has a significant impact on the cost of protection, and nobody has to be told how important that is in an industry badly hit by financial crises.”
ISSG deploys eight man teams, each member of which is a fully certified seafarer, including a medical officer. Says Murrell: “If you’re going to put someone onboard a ship, they have to understand ships and seafarers and their responsibilities as seafarers. If you put someone onboard a ship who isn’t a qualified seafarer you can run into all sorts of problems, some them legal, and they can become a danger to themselves and other seafarers.”
In the long term, piracy can only be resolved through economic, developmental and political means but it is something we have to learn to deal with, effectively and economically to protect seafarers, their ships, and the industry.”
For further information contact: admin@issg-seamarshals.com
By: Michael Murrell on March 9, 2009
at 11:45 am
I want abbriviations of
PCS
VSC
DDC
ACD
Regarding Sea Export
By: Bharat Kale on May 23, 2009
at 12:30 pm
Just discovered this site today.I am new to the shipping industry and would like to be updated on recent development in the shipping indusrty.
By: Paul Nwobi on June 12, 2009
at 11:55 am
yes.
By: Paul Nwobi on June 12, 2009
at 11:56 am
I own a clearing and forwarding business and am looking for network opportunities on a global scale. any advise as to where the best conferences are to attend?
By: James on June 18, 2009
at 4:21 pm
Hi James, i cant comment off hand on the best conferences to attend.. There are several that happen in SA on a time to time basis, but for starters i would suggest you join a business network on the internet – something like LinkedIn.. There are several business, freight, maritime and logistics groups in there..
You can also find me there http://www.linkedin.com/in/manaadiar..
By: manaadiar on June 19, 2009
at 6:11 pm
I will try to get a couple things into you soon, just have been a bit busy lately.
Regards to all
By: Michael Murrell on August 2, 2009
at 3:28 pm
Today’s shipping operators are faced with two major choices. Several organizations offer a “one-size-fits-all” approach that is projected onto all vessels. There are two challenges with this approach. The first is that a plan that offers a reasonable expectation of success would be extraordinarily, and often unnecessarily, expensive. The second is that a more cost-effective approach may well account for the unique features of the transit, the vessel, the crew, its operation or the threats that the vessel may face. The second choice, which appears on the surface to be more difficult, follows more of a business approach in that it evaluates the activity in terms of risk and then develops safeguards based upon sound practices, methods that have proved successful in past similar instances, or that have a reasonable expectation of being successful based on the knowledge and understanding of the threat.
This latter approach is used in business all the time, generally when examining new or emerging markets or business lines. As a result, one managers move beyond the terminology specific to the security industry, they should become comfortable with what is happening: (1) an examination of the goals to be achieved and assets involved, (2) an assessment of risk, (3) guidance made regarding the appropriate and acceptable levels of risk, and (4) the implementation of measures used to ensure that that risk can be monitored and maintained at appropriate levels. What needs to be clear in the mind of the manager, however, is that these are consecutive steps that trade a slightly longer planning cycle in return for the more efficient and effective use of resources.
The maritime environment offers unique opportunities for those protecting the security of the vessel, and unique challenges. On one hand, the vessels being protected are generally disadvantaged in terms of size or speed when compared against smaller, more maneuverable craft. At the same time, however, the array of sensing technologies and routines aboard the vessel assist in it becoming a moving defense platform that can actually be used to manipulate its immediate environment to best advantage.
The Maritime Operations Guide plan is the foundation upon which operational planning and execution are based. It defines the functions and concepts of operations of the system as a whole, the leadership and missions of each participant and how those participants interact within the overall system.
By: Michael Murrell on August 8, 2009
at 1:59 am
HI!
Great site indeed! I’ve always wanted to be in freight industry as a sales executive please help on how i should go about. Currently forex sales consultant ( 7yrs exp ).
Regards
Greg
By: Greg on August 9, 2009
at 7:24 am
I had some thoughts in regards to the numbers that have been floating around on piracy reporting in the Horn of Africa region, as compared with this year and last year. Last year the number of reported piracy attacks in the region are about 111 total attacks with about 42 hijackings for the year. This year, there have been approximately 32 hijackings with about 250 reported attacks for the same area, being the Gulf of Aden and the East Coast of Africa.
The reported hijackings are probably pretty factual, however, my thoughts are on the
supposed increase in attacks. When looking at the Live Piracy map by the IMB as a basis, I can see that the reported attacks of course have gone up dramatically, however, for some reason, the reported sightings of “suspicious” vessels stands at only three. This is what caught my eye and started my thought process as to the reality of attacks. The IMB admits that less than 50% of attacks are reported to the IMB, as merchant vessels are not ‘required’ to report attacks. Through a few informal talks with seaman, I found that the only attacks that are normally reported, are those that result in significant damage to the vessel, serious injury to a crew member, or of course, the actual successful hijacking itself. This is mostly due to the desire to maintain an ‘incident free’ situation with insurance
carriers, and the fact that if an attack is reported, the vessel may be held up for inspection causing unnecessary time delays and other matters with some port authorities. I have come to a few conclusions or a theory as to why the numbers have jumped significantly, and how the reporting of this can be very misleading. First we will start with the reporting. Most articles or reports, are missing one key element, and that is the word “REPORTED.” When the article is written or given on television, it is given that the number of attacks has significantly risen in the region. They are not taking into account that it is the number of Reported attacks has risen.
If you look at the numbers of reported attacks for the region, it is well over 100%
increase in the reported attacks, and we are not even finished with the year. However, the most interesting element, is if the attacks had actually increased, then the number of sightings of suspicious vessels would have increased dramatically as well. This significant increase in reported attacks coincides with the naval presence in the region. The navy ships are compelled to report all activity, to include calls for help by merchant vessels being attacked by pirates. n. However, the merchant vessels are not reporting a significant increase in the sightings of suspicious vessels. In order for the number of attacks to have literally increased over 100%, there would have to be a significant increase in actual pirate boats and pirates themselves. Almost all reported attacks involve about two skiffs, sometimes three and sometimes one. Therefore, there would have to be twice as many pirates on the water for the figures to match. I therefore conclude that the attack rate has not risen significantly, merely the reporting of the attacks has risen significantly.
I have concluded that this is the case due to the naval presence in the region. Before the naval presence, the merchant vessels fended for themselves and did not report attacks unless of the damage to the vessel, injury to the crew or an actual hijacking took place. Now that the naval entities are there, the merchant vessels have someone to call for help in the event of an attack. The naval vessels are compelled to report the call of distress, therefore, the number of reported incidents has risen significantly. Another way to substantiate this theory, is when
the incident is reported, the name of the vessel is not normally reported. Therefore, the report to the IMB came from the navy, not the individual vessel filing the report. The response to this may be causing the maritime industry to go in the wrong direction when it comes to vessel defense. The answer is not to rely on the naval flotilla, but to take the appropriate action to protect their own vessels.
Anyway, just some of my thoughts, this is not a scientific study.
By: Michael Murrell on August 14, 2009
at 2:55 pm
Our company ships internationally on a daily basis. I would be happy to comment on your blog posts if I have any insight.
The issues we hear is insuring through high risk (hijacking) areas. Maybe a clarification for all to help muddle through this stick issue?
By: Freight88 on August 17, 2009
at 8:17 pm
Thanks Freight88.. Please do send me any guest post to manaadiar@live.co.za and i will gladly put them up with credit to you.. You can write on the insurance issue you mentioned.. Looking forward to your post..
By: manaadiar on August 18, 2009
at 9:18 am
ISSG Holdings, Ltd. and Evolutionary Security Management, Inc. have developed an unparalleled anti-piracy vessel survey program for the maritime industry. This survey is conducted in two parts. First we send a trained security surveyor to your vessel, anywhere in the world to conduct the survey without interrupting the ships schedule. The report of the security survey is then transmitted to Evolutionary Security Management, Inc. in Canada, where an exhaustive assessment is conducted, and report issued back to the company.
Being appropriately prepared for an attack by pirates requires an approach that is based on sound judgment and analysis. The approach put forward in this program is intended to meet that goal while clearly demonstrating the company’s alignment with Section 29 of MSC 1333 put forward by the IMO in June 2009 and other elements of the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. While the IMO’s guidance is indicated as being a preferred practice, it can be construed, given the maritime culture, as a best practice for companies seeking to demonstrate that they are exercising their due diligence. This approach is further supported by security doctrine that has undergone a peer review to ensure its soundness and consistency with security doctrine and practices.
Theory:
The three following cycles play pivotal roles in the defence of the vessel:
1. Protection, detection, response and recovery;
2. Deter, detect, delay, deny and detain or destroy; and
3. Mitigation, preparation, response and recovery.
In the first cycle, the goal is for the vessel to be able to be adequately hardened against reasonably foreseeable threats. Having been hardened, the next goal is for the vessel to be able to detect and respond to threats effectively. Finally, infrastructure should be included that allows for the vessel to recover from a range of known impacts.
In the second cycle, the focus is on the security operations of the vessel. In this case, the hardening of the vessel and other activities ideally deter the attacker. If this is not possible, however, the goal is for the vessel to be able to detect and delay the attacker from boarding the vessel (and progressively more sensitive areas) until help arrives. Finally, the goal is to be able to deny access to personnel , potential hostages, or critical aspects of the ship. Finally, the ship may want to maintain the means of being able to detain or destroy a potential attacker, although this option will rarely be acceptable.
In the third cycle, the goal is to take steps to minimize the potential impacts of an attack as part of the long-term corporate activities. The first cycle plays a significant role in the preparation of the vessel while the second cycle plays a significant role in the response phase. The final recovery phase ensures that the ship, its crew and the assets on board are protected so that normal operations can resume expeditiously.
The Approach:
There are four basic elements required in order to perform a valid survey of a vessel. These four elements are the following:
An understanding of the threat, including its knowledge, skills, abilities and traditional resources; ·
An understanding of the vessel from an engineering perspective; ·
An understanding of the operations of the vessel, particularly its navigation and how it deals with security events;
and · An understanding of the crew and its ability to respond.
Before setting out on the survey, the surveyor must review the threat profile of the potential threat in the area. Particular attention should be paid to the intent, number of craft, number of persons per craft, knowledge, skills, abilities, and resources (particularly weapons and tools) available to the attacker. This can often be provided through the Evolutionary Security website (marineweb). To get access to this web, you will need to contact
amcdougall@evolutionarysecurity.ca
The second element deals with how robust the vessel is or, in other terms, how well it is likely to withstand an attack. This is broken down into two sub-elements. The first element deals with the materials, engineering and design used in the construction of the vessel. This is a question of robustness. The second sub-element, however, looks at whether or not the design offers the attacker the means or opportunity to gradually penetrate onto the vessel, into the superstructure, and then to progressively more protected compartments.
While the second element deals with how well the ship can defend itself (a question of preparation), the third element looks at the elements of response and recovery. Having detected a suspicious vessel or potentially hostile situation, can the vessel outrun, outmaneuver, or otherwise navigate in such a way that it enhances the ship’s natural design features? This is the first sub-element. The second sub-element involves whether or not the ship has the necessary preparations, plans, procedures and testing completed to validate whether or not the infrastructure on board the vessel is working.
The final element of four involves the training and understanding of the crew. This is not part of the ship survey and fits more closely into an inspection under regulatory regimes, etc. We want, however, to remind the ship owner and operator that technology is only one piece of the challenge, the other is a capable and confident crew. Incident reports have borne out the conclusion that those that have solid plans and look like they know how to execute them have a reduced chance of being attacked over those that appear unprepared.
We believe that the Vessel Survey for Anti-Piracy Risk Assessment is vital in the maritime industry today. This program not only enhances the capability of the ship and crew to be prepared, but is one of the most cost effective ways for shipping companies to exercise due diligence and a sound security practice.
By: Michael Murrell on August 24, 2009
at 2:36 pm
WHY SECURITY QUOTATIONS SHOULD NOT BE RECEIVED IMMEDIATELY.
Ship security is becoming big business—but is it delivering a service in line with the risks that you need to address? Remember, your business is about moving persons and goods from one location to another so that they arrive at that location on time and in acceptable condition. If they don’t, you face not being paid, being forced to pay penalties, or higher operating costs in the future. You may also face losing clients that lose trust in your ability to maintain reasonable costs or even make delivery. If you hold a position of trust within your organization, you will someday find yourself having to answer one of two questions—were the measures that you took adequate to the situation or were the measures that you took really necessary and a worthwhile use of resources?
This needs to be answered in two parts. First, what is the risk to the vessel in terms of its transit? Is the vessel susceptible in some way to some kind of attack that could lead to the transit being interrupted, the cargo (or passengers) being lost, or even the vessel being taken? Each vessel is reasonably unique. They may share common characteristics depending on their class or type, but when you look at the vessel and how it operates as an entity on the water, it is now a unique being. The second question is how important is this transit to your company? Is the company relying on the transit in order to stay in business or is it simply one of many iteration of the same thing? Why is this important? Because the impact changes as the transit becomes more crucial to your organization’s survival.
As a person holding a position of corporate trust—either to the executive as a trusted advisor or to the shareholders as a capable executive—you need to have a sound basis for your answer if you are going to at least appear to be exercising your due diligence. You need to be prepared to answer why the services you are paying for, right down to the particular safeguards, should be considered an effective and efficient use of resources. That means that you need the security company to provide you with reasonable, logical arguments as to why they should be allowed to put administrative, physical (barriers), procedural or other kinds of protective measures on board your vessel. If they cannot provide this, you need to ask yourself whether or not the service that they are purporting to provide really would be adequate to the challenge at hand and, frankly, you will only be doing so based on luck, not on your exercising due diligence in making the decision.
In the security community, any security safeguard should be based upon a security assessment (often called the threat and risk assessment). In short, the safeguard is there to answer the question that the risk assessment asks the person responsible—is this level of risk appropriate and acceptable? If not, then you determine what steps or measures are put in place so that the risk is treated appropriately. What you should not see, is an immediate response to your question about how you would be protected unless the security company has examined those elements of the risk assessment that are needed in order to arrive at a logical basis for what they are going to propose.
Remember, risk management is more than simply addressing one of many issues. It is about appropriately responding to as many issues as possible in such a way that the delicate balance of operations is not disrupted inappropriately. You should not trade security risk for legal or operational risk where those other two risks would cause an equivalent or greater injury to your organization. Why? Because risk management is about being able to assure your organization and your clients that they can count on you to deliver on your own promises to them.
Some thoughts for ship managers and owners to ponder.
Allan McDougall (BA BMASc PCIP CMAS CISSP)
By: Michael Murrell on September 4, 2009
at 5:43 am
It is very important that shipping companies have up to date information in regards to the piracy situation. Piracy is a global issue, but for now seems to be focused in the Gulf of Aden. evolutionary Security Management Inc. of Canada is a partner in risk analysis and assessment with ISSG Holdings, Ltd. Allan Mcdougall produces a Bi-monthly Anti-Piracy assessment that can be found at;
http://www.issg-seamarshals.com/files/sep2009.pdf
This publication is issued for free to the maritime community.
By: Michael Murrell on September 10, 2009
at 5:27 pm
We would like to get in touch with customs agents in Zimbabwe that are set up at the border crossings to assist us with shipments we have that are DDP.
By: Julia on September 12, 2009
at 1:31 am
MATS College of Technology, ISSG Holdings and Evolutionary Security Management are pleased to announce that they have reached a significant milestone in their efforts to support the seafarer community’s anti-piracy efforts through specialized practical anti-piracy training. The product of several months’ research and development, this training will provide seafarers with training that is specifically designed to meet this rising global challenge.
MATS College of Technology, a leading maritime training institution in the Philippines, has nearly forty years of history in training seafarers for the global maritime industry and is located within the city of Davao. Graduates from MATS College of Technology have often been found amongst the top graduates within the region.
ISSG Holdings, a specialized provider of ship security and high-risk transits, provides operational support and knowledge that will ensure that the training candidates receive encompasses the latest understanding of the operational environment. This is further refined through ISSG Holdings commitment to ensuring that the shipping industry receives both relevant and reliable ship security services, maintaining constant lines of communication with shipping companies, manning agencies and other supporting elements.
Evolutionary Security Management, a recognized training institution for maritime security based in Ontario, Canada, has been a leading research organization within the Transportation Security community with strong ties to first responder, professional security and asset protection associations. These include taking on leadership roles within those communities. The lines of communication into these professional associations ensure that the training provided to candidates aligns with best practices and sound security doctrine.
Located in Davao City, this course is easily accessible to the maritime and seafarer communities, taking into account the need for a cost-effective solution within the maritime industry. The vast majority of seafarers being drawn from this community mean that shipping companies and manning agencies are not burdened with the high travel and accommodation costs that are often encountered when attempting to coordinate specialized training in certain other parts of the globe. Concurrently, shipping companies and manning agencies have the option of having full crews undergo the training together, a practice that reinforces the crew’s ability to respond cohesively. Direct flights from Singapore, a major transportation hub, ensure that this training can be accessible across the global community.
By blending theoretical (classroom) and practical (on board vessel) training that culminates in a live practical exercise on board a vessel, this training is unique in its preparation of seafarers for real-world events. By building this capacity, this is the first course that balances the history and traditions of the professional merchant mariner with leading edge security practices and theory in a way that will have significant and cumulative benefits across the maritime industry. Full time courses are scheduled to start in mid November.
By: Michael Murrell on September 29, 2009
at 11:02 am
MATS College of Technology, ISSG Holdings, and Evolutionary Security Management are pleased to announce our Anti-Piracy / Ship Security Training. This intensive three day course includes one day of comprehensive theoretical training in the classroom followed by two days of rigorous practical training on board a vessel. On the final day, candidates will participate in a full scale exercise that safely simulates events taking into account the latest knowledge of tactics and sound security practices.
Following participation in the exercise, candidates that complete all three days will be issued a certificate from the MATS College of Technology, an IMO recognized Maritime Training Centre.
http://www.issg-seamarshals.com/files/piracy_flyer.pdf
By: Michael Murrell on October 4, 2009
at 7:29 am